JACKEDFORUMS

ARA-290

Cibinetide · Cibinetide · pHBSP · Pyroglutamate helix B surface peptide · Helix B surface peptide

EPO-derived peptide targeting the innate repair receptor, trialled for small-fibre neuropathy.

Typical dose

2 mg

once daily

Range

1–4

mg

Half-life

20 min

see Dosing

Evidence

Early human

Subcutaneous

What it is

ARA-290, INN cibinetide, is an 11-amino-acid peptide copied from helix B of erythropoietin, specifically the face of the EPO molecule that points away from the classical EPO receptor. The design is deliberate: it keeps EPO's tissue-protective and anti-inflammatory signalling while removing everything that raises red cell mass.

It works through the innate repair receptor, a heterocomplex of the EPO receptor and the beta-common receptor CD131. That complex only assembles on cells under metabolic stress or injury, so ARA-290 is largely inert in healthy tissue and acts selectively where damage or inflammation is already present.

After thymosin alpha-1 it is the most seriously trialled compound in this group. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 studies in sarcoidosis-associated small-fibre neuropathy and in type 2 diabetes both showed improvement in neuropathic symptoms, and the sarcoidosis work also showed an increase in corneal nerve-fibre density, an objective structural marker. Development stalled after phase 2 and it was never approved anywhere.

How it works

ARA-290 binds the EPO-receptor/CD131 heterodimer known as the innate repair receptor, which is only expressed on cells experiencing hypoxia, metabolic stress or injury. Engaging it activates JAK2/STAT3 and PI3K/Akt signalling, switches on anti-apoptotic pathways, suppresses local pro-inflammatory cytokine output, and shifts macrophages away from an inflammatory phenotype.

In nerve tissue this shows up as reduced apoptosis of small unmyelinated C-fibres and measurable regrowth of nerve endings. Because it has essentially no affinity for the EPO-receptor homodimer that drives erythropoiesis, it does not raise haematocrit, red cell mass or thrombotic risk the way EPO does.

Dosing

Typical single dose2 mg
Reported range1–4 mg
Frequencyonce daily
Injections per week7
Half-lifeAbout 2 minutes intravenously and roughly 20-30 minutes subcutaneously, but receptor-mediated tissue effects far outlast plasma exposure, which is why once-daily dosing works despite the short half-life.
TimingOnce daily, subcutaneous into abdominal fat. Time of day is not important; day-to-day consistency matters more than the clock.
Typical run length4 weeks
RoutesSubcutaneous
Molecular weight1257 Da
SequenceQEQLERALNSS

4 mg daily for 28 days is the dose with actual randomised-trial support. The 1-2 mg protocols common in the community are a cost compromise and sit below the dose that produced the published results.

Reconstitution calculator

Pre-loaded with ARA-290’s vial size, water volume and typical dose. Change anything.

Typical: 2 mg · range 1–4

0102030405040 units0.5 mL insulin · U-100 · 1-unit marks

Draw to

40 u

0.4 mL · 2 mg

Concentration

5 mg/mL

50 mcg per unit

Doses per vial

2.5

Vial lasts

2.5 days

Draw to 40 units on the barrel.

Once mixed
Refrigerate at 2-8 C and use within about 30 days.

Full calculator →
Suggested water1 mL per 5 mg vial
Common vial sizes5 mg, 16 mg

1 mL of bacteriostatic water into a 5 mg vial gives 5 mg/mL, so a 2 mg dose is 0.4 mL, or 40 units on a U-100 syringe. Doses here are milligram-scale, so injection volumes are much larger than with most peptides; a larger vial reconstituted at higher concentration keeps the volume manageable.

Storage

Before mixing

Sealed lyophilised vials keep about 24 months at -20 C and several months at 2-8 C.

After mixing

Refrigerate at 2-8 C and use within about 30 days.

Reported benefits

  • Reduced neuropathic pain scores in randomised placebo-controlled phase 2 trials
  • Increased corneal nerve-fibre density, an objective marker of small-fibre regrowth
  • Improved metabolic control and HbA1c in a type 2 diabetes trial
  • No effect on haematocrit or red cell mass, unlike EPO itself
  • Receptor only assembles on stressed tissue, so off-target activity is low
  • Well tolerated across 28-day human dosing periods

Side effects

  • Mild injection-site reactions, the most common finding in trials
  • Occasional headache
  • Transient fatigue during the first days of dosing
  • Local discomfort from the large injection volume at milligram-scale doses
  • Long-term safety beyond 28 days of continuous use is untested in humans

Do not use if

  • Active malignancy, since innate repair receptor signalling is anti-apoptotic and some tumours express the receptor components
  • Uncontrolled proliferative retinopathy, on the same anti-apoptotic and pro-angiogenic reasoning
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding, where there is no data

Evidence level — Early human

Small or early-phase human studies only.

Not approved in any market; cibinetide completed phase 2 trials and is now sold only as a research chemical.

Commonly run with

ARA-290 FAQ

Will ARA-290 raise my haematocrit like EPO?+

No. It was engineered from the part of the EPO molecule that does not contact the erythropoietic receptor, and human trials measured no change in red cell mass or haematocrit. It carries none of EPO's thrombotic risk and is not a blood-doping agent.

How long before neuropathy symptoms change?+

In the sarcoidosis trial, symptom scores separated from placebo across the 28-day dosing period and corneal nerve density had increased by day 28. Anecdotally the first shift in burning or numbness tends to show up in weeks 2-3, so a course shorter than four weeks is unlikely to tell you much.

Why do community protocols run so far below the trial dose?+

Cost. At 4 mg daily a 28-day course consumes 112 mg of peptide, which is expensive at typical research-chemical pricing. Running 1-2 mg is a reasonable compromise, but be clear with yourself that it is below the dose that produced the published outcomes.

Does it help nerve pain that is not from diabetes or sarcoidosis?+

Animal models cover traumatic nerve injury, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and ischaemic damage, and the receptor mechanism is not disease-specific. Human evidence is confined to those two populations though, so anything else is extrapolation.

Is it worth stacking with BPC-157?+

They act by different mechanisms, so the pairing is common for nerve-related complaints. BPC-157 has a much larger anecdotal base for peripheral nerve recovery but almost no human data, while ARA-290 has the trial evidence. Neither has been studied in combination with the other.

References

  1. 1.ARA 290 improves symptoms in patients with sarcoidosis-associated small nerve fiber loss and increases corneal nerve fiber densityMolecular Medicine (2013) PMID 24136731
  2. 2.Safety and efficacy of ARA 290 in sarcoidosis patients with symptoms of small fiber neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind pilot studyMolecular Medicine (2012) PMID 23168581
  3. 3.ARA 290, a nonerythropoietic peptide engineered from erythropoietin, improves metabolic control and neuropathic symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetesMolecular Medicine (2015) PMID 25387363
  4. 4.Nonerythropoietic, tissue-protective peptides derived from the tertiary structure of erythropoietinProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2008) PMID 18676614

More immune & inflammation