Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

SARMS? injectable and/or tablets

Ha ha it is cold I been outside all morning so far, 19 here and windy
 
This is my problem with them these big companies spent a ton of money producing these and never put them to market.
There’s a reason for this even if they didn’t work well they would have marketed them towards something but they didn’t and that worries me that they have knowledge of long term damage.

I can’t think of another reason not to market.

Even anadrol made it to market and its super toxic just not as toxic as sdrol which never made it to market
 
Last edited:
I’ve been in med sales my whole life… these companies are always looking for a most cost effective/ better alternative. Their perspective comes from a therapeutic angle … not ours aka muscle enhancing. So my theory is the traditional steroids do a good job and they found no real benefit changing protocols for people with HIV, muscle waisting conditions, burn victims etc.
 
I don’t know brother in the states there really against hormones so if they could replace the hormones with SARMS wouldn’t they so they could then get rid of all the hormones.

Me personally I just don’t trust them but I also don’t run tren or sdrol things that aren’t made for humans and or haven’t been studied in humans for years just aren’t for me so im definitely a biased voice in the discussion.
 
Last edited:
TBH was never a fan of em, gave em a try couple times, just wasn’t worth it for me, but hey that’s my 2 pennies and a ball of lint, I’m sure there’s plenty of members who had great results with sarms
 
Not interested. The cost to benefit isn’t there plus the unknowns. I at least know what I’m getting into with test and most studied compounds and can gauge the risk I want to take. Maybe one day, they seem promising but I’d rather not grow a third nipple or something
 
I used injectable lgd4033, and it worked well similar to NPP but destroyed lipids like any anabolic. HDL and LDL were horrible like tren after. Most SARMs atleast to me seem very similar to anabolics if taken at similar dosages. They are just less studied and newer. Rad140 is my favorite, and has a decent amount of research. As a safety study was conducted at 150mg ED, which is a shit ton. I only take 20-30mg.

If your prices are similar to other vendors I would consider buying. Because SRX has never let me down.
 
I ran 8 weeks of RAD a few months back with just my 200 mgs of pharma cyp… I put it right there with any low / mod dose of T-Bol. I’m going to do my spring reduction from feb-April with test prop, ostarine MK2866, 3 iu GH and of course clean eating and 45 min daily cardio. Tons of shitty SARMS sources out there …I can certainly share my source, but I don’t want to impede on any rules @Bigmurph
 
Here a post RAD / test cyp / 2 iu GH and “holiday eating” pic from a month ago… was about 241 lbs… which is heavy for me, but kept my waist around 34-35 inches and body fat under 16%…
 

Attachments

  • ECA61962-1894-4091-A4B5-C970532B2110.jpeg
    ECA61962-1894-4091-A4B5-C970532B2110.jpeg
    650 KB · Views: 49
That is the part about sarms it’s like hgh was years ago a crapshoot you get lucky sometimes you get crap sometimes I bet they will progress as more research and technology arise I mean hey they can make a vaccine in three weeks with lithium ammonia some stuff rock salt sulphur acid more stuff oh wait that’s something else lol!!!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top